I was watching NBC Nightly News (with Tom Brokaw) last week and a press conference with Clinton was
being aired. A few key phrases caught my attention, so I perked my little ears right up and this diatribe came from two little
partial sentences I happened to hear;
"We will minimize the human loss....."
"There have been regrettable deaths..."
So, a certain number of people are expendable now, Mr. President? In war is it inevitable that some
civilians will be killed? If so, does the UN or Mr. Clinton feel at all bad about their pilot(s) killing innocent people?
In my opnion, no, they know that they made the decision to interfere on behalf of a repressed people - ethnic Albanians -
who happen to out number Serbs in Kosovo at a ratio of 9 to 1. They also know that no matter what, they must be able to call
this little skirmish a "win" in the end to keep the approval of the military-hungry US public. If we win, it's okay that our
leaders kill absolutely innocent people - those same people deemed refugees by the media who we send countless 'care packages'
rounded up by our local schools and humanitarian organizations. However, should we lose, the public will quickly adopt the
growing voice of protest and call this whole "incident" an atrocity of Americans again sticking their noses where they do
not belong. Ah, so finicky and indecisive is the American public. This more than anything else about the Kosovo incident alarms
and disturbs me. Have we sunk to the point that just because people are a world away and we happen to have rammed our military
nose into their business and problems that we then have a right to treat them inhumanely? By mistake or not, bombing the trucks
of refugees is simply another demonstration of the incompetence of our homeland's forces.
Bravo, incompetency and indiscretion!